Return on
investment (ROI). It's one of the most commonly used phrases in the direct
marketing lexicon and one of the paramount benchmarks on which success or
failure of a campaign is measured.
But as common a concept as
ROI is, many direct marketers still don't perform the analysis or, perhaps
worse, perform it incorrectly. As a financial analysis, ROI is a measure of a
company's net income related to its total asset investment. For direct
marketers, that "asset investment" generally is the advertising cost
associated with generating the sales that contribute the net income. Depending
on the business, it also could include the investment in inventory to sell.
For the purpose of this
column, the focus is on advertising dollars as the investment to illustrate the
technique.
ROI then is the net
profits (the return) related to the advertising dollars spent (the investment).
For example, if, after all costs are accounted for, net profits for a campaign
are $10,000 and the advertising costs for producing and mailing the piece are
$50,000, ROI would be equal to $10,000 divided by $50,000 or 20 percent.
What ROI is not is sales
divided by ad spend. This is a common mistake. By focusing on sales as the
numerator, none of the pertinent costs are addressed, and the calculation is
virtually meaningless from a decision-making standpoint. If, using the numbers
above, a company generated $95,000 in sales with its $50,000 investment, this
miscalculation would render a 190 percent "ROI." But if costs rise in
any key areas such as cost of goods, advertising expenses, fulfillment or
overhead, the profits will shrink and a big sales generator may become an
investment loser.
Using ROI Analysis
For most mailers, ROI analysis is applicable as a strategy-level analysis as well as a post-mortem analysis.
For most mailers, ROI analysis is applicable as a strategy-level analysis as well as a post-mortem analysis.
As a strategic analysis, a
pro forma ROI should be evaluated prior to any effort or campaign. Each
campaign, when built, typically is forecasted for sales and net profits at the
segment level, as well as overall. That campaign P&L becomes the foundation
for the ROI analysis, and the results of the analysis should provide insights
during the decision-making process for whether a campaign should be executed
and to what extent.
If the company's ROI
requirement is 25 percent and the pro forma analysis suggests an expected ROI
of 50 percent, this may indicate the mailing can go deeper into the housefile
or can be mailed to more prospects. It's also important to perform the ROI
analysis to establish campaign expectations against which the final results of
a campaign can be measured.
As a post-mortem tool, ROI
analysis answers the question, "What did we get for our money?" and
starts the process of establishing the next effort's strategy. After a campaign
is complete, ROI analysis should be performed on as many aspects of a mailing
as possible, including version tests, offer tests, individual drops and
individual segments. Armed with this information, planning for the next effort
starts with an understanding of the effects of various offers and versions on
various customer and prospect groups and exactly what those variables generate
for every marketing dollar spent.
As a decision-making tool,
ROI obviously is valuable. If a company can get more for its money by letting
it generate interest in a bank account than it can get by investing in a
marketing effort, the money should stay put until either a program that will perform
better is found or a way to make the existing program perform better by
improving costs, increasing average order values or cutting the advertising
expense is discovered.
Calculating ROI
Calculating ROI isn't difficult. It starts with a P&L, which most companies would run as a pro forma prior to a campaign and as a final complete after a campaign is executed. A typical cataloger's P&L groups together the merchandise, fulfillment, advertising and overhead components, so key benchmarks can be used to manage costs.
Calculating ROI isn't difficult. It starts with a P&L, which most companies would run as a pro forma prior to a campaign and as a final complete after a campaign is executed. A typical cataloger's P&L groups together the merchandise, fulfillment, advertising and overhead components, so key benchmarks can be used to manage costs.
The P&L provides the
necessary information for calculating ROI: earnings before interest and taxes
divided by advertising costs. In this example, ROI is $100,489 divided by
$533,672 or 19 percent. If this cataloger can get better than 19 percent return
on its money by leaving it in the bank, it should. Otherwise, this program is
successful, and the ROI baseline should be used to compare other potential
programs against it in the future.
A pro forma ROI, run prior
to the final go/no go decision for a campaign, can be less detailed but should
follow the same general guidelines as the P&L version. The chart above is
an example of a pro forma that uses projected data, based on historical mailing
performance and established corporate benchmarks for costs, to establish the
figures for the ROI calculation. Going into the mailing, the company knows that
if, for example, the required return on capital is 30 percent, the campaign in
question will dramatically exceed that. From here, adjustments can be made in
the plan to perhaps mail deeper or more frequently to "water down"
the ROI to a point where sales are maximized and profits are minimized down to
the required level of return.
As you can see, ROI
analysis isn't difficult to do, it just takes a little time to set up the
process to run the calculations. Once set, the findings can be powerful. ROI
analysis, run correctly, is as likely to find money left on the table as it is
to find pet projects that will never be worth the money.
No comments:
Post a Comment